NCOC Featured Discussion

Civic Health Index Finds America in the Midst of Civic Foreclosure

August 27, 2009
Study Finds that God, Friends and Facebook are Important Factors for Fostering Civic Engagement
More Information
As economic distress continues through the summer and into the fall, Americans are suffering from a “civic foreclosure” that is limiting the range and depth of their civic engagement, according to a new study by National Conference on Citizenship (NCoC). The annual America’s Civic Health Index, based on survey data collected in May 2009, is a look at the state of civic engagement in America that reflects the impact of the economic crisis.

The survey’s results reflect the hard choices Americans have made during the downturn, with 72 percent of respondents saying they have cut back on time engaged in civic participation, which includes time spent volunteering, participating in groups or performing other civic activities in their communities. Public perception supports this finding, as 66 percent of Americans say they feel other people are responding to the current economic downturn by looking out for themselves, with only 19 percent saying people around them are responding to the recession by helping each other more.

“The economic crisis has triggered civic foreclosure,” said Michael Weiser, NCoC Chairman, “The good heart of Americans is still very evident, though, as they refocus on basic needs.”

Even though they are disproportionately affected by the economic downturn, low-income Americans are still finding ways to give back to their communities. Thirty-nine percent of respondents with an income less than $50,000 reported helping others by providing food or shelter, compared to only 27 percent of Americans with a higher income. Overall, 50 percent of Americans gave food or money to someone who was not a relative, while 17 percent allowed a relative to live in their home and more than one-in-ten took in non-relatives.

The Civic Health Index also explored the relationship between online forms of engagement and community-based civic activities. The results found that Millennials who use social networking sites for civic purposes are far more likely to actively engage in civic participation in their communities.

Religion plays a major role in civic engagement, as 40 percent of respondents who reported they are frequent participants in religious services noted they had increased their level of civic engagement. In addition, individuals who reported they had a high level of social activity – visiting often with friends, eating together as a family or belonging to a local club – also reported an increase in civic engagement. The results indicate that social engagement through church, friends or even via social networking sites can have a significant impact in countering the negative effect of the current economic downturn on civic engagement.

“God, friends, and Facebook provide a civic safety net,” said David B. Smith, NCoC Executive Director, “Spending time with others enhances social connections that provide resiliency in tough economic times.”

The Civic Health Index also found generational differences. Of those surveyed, Baby Boomers had the lowest volunteering rate at 35 percent, while Millennials had the highest rate at 43 percent. However, in terms of material contributions including providing food, money or shelter, Baby Boomers were far more likely to provide support (38 percent) compared to Millennials (28 percent).

“We had hoped the economic hardship might trigger more compassion as people saw real suffering and needs,” said John Bridgeland, Chairman of NCoC’s Advisory Board and CEO of Civic Enterprises. “While this is not true for volunteering, it is true for providing food and shelter. And people with the least means are giving the most.”

Other Key Findings
• 31 percent of survey respondents noted they had a “great deal of confidence” in small businesses, making them the most trusted institution. In turn, major companies ranked last on the Index in terms of public confidence (5 percent), with banks, Congress and the executive branch garnering 6 percent.
• 40 percent of African Americans expressed some level of trust in federal government, compared to only 22 percent of Whites
• 68 percent of respondents say that they would be willing to provide food to those in need
• 69 percent of respondents say that they would buy U.S.-made products to help foster improved local economic activity

America’s Civic Health Index is released annually in conjunction with NCoC’s conference. The conference will be held on Wednesday, September 9, in Washington, D.C., and will explore the issues presented in this year’s Civic Health Index. Registration remains open at www.ncoc.net/conference.
If you like this kind of content, sign up for an NCoC.net account and we'll customize your homepage recommendations based on your interests..
GLOSSARY OF TERMS...

 

5 Comments
By Linda at 11:26 AM on Aug 27th, 2009
THANK YOU for this. It confirms what I have been seeing for some time at my small, local grassroots group, and even in a broader view of the local community's interest and support for charitable works. Scary to think that after a national election that engaged a deeper range of voters than almost any other, we are no witnessing the closing down of that same sense of ownership and engagement in public policy.
By Kristen Cambell at 12:18 PM on Aug 27th, 2009
Hi, Linda,
Thanks for your comment and valuable perspective. The Civic Health Index survey took place in May 2009, which was a real low-point in the economic and political climate, and we feel this report encapsulates the degree to which American communities are really struggling. This is a great time for nonprofits and government institutions to evaluate their efforts and programs to ensure they are best meeting the needs of their communities, providing meaningful opportunities for citizen engagement, and addressing public problems.
By David B. Smith at 12:23 PM on Aug 27th, 2009
Linda, thanks for your comment and snapshot of what you are seeing in your community. These are tough times and people are pulling back in significant ways.

However, this refocusing of engagement towards our friends and family may have some silver lining. As people begin to spend more time on local needs, we might see a resurgence of citizen-centered engagement. We should urge our policy makers, philanthropists, businesses, and nonprofits to invest in local decision making. Individual citizens are best equipped to identify local problems, propose local solutions, and implement those solutions through the support of local institutions.

A deeper investment in this revised approach to problem solving should pay dividends as we emerge from this civic depression.
By Alex Moll at 4:18 PM on Sep 8th, 2009
Interesting perspectives all. Some of the findings are troubling, although much it, I believe may have to do with education. How many average Americans are familiar with what 'citizen-centered' engagement really means or entails? I've spoken with 4-H high school students and some who are involved in debate teams, and another school that promotes shared inquiry into deep questions youth face. Among adults, I've seen much interest in advocacy and even the thirst for in-depth conversations about public issues.

Yet, in our society, there is still a disconnect between public deliberation, engagement, and advocacy largely because most Americans do not learn (or practice) the art of conversation, listening, and group decision-making, especially outside of traditional social circles. Most of us only learn conflict and how to approach politics in adversarial terms or techniques, such as petitioning. Our First Amendment enshrines such a right, and it has its place. Yet, the investment in local decision-making among citizens, the freedom of assembly for instance, the focus on citizen-centered and led initiatives for change have occurred across the country, but often the news media may not report it or sometimes it may be politically risky for some parties to invest in outcomes of decision-making less predictable than a pre-screen task force of experts only.

David is right and I share his charge that we ought to urge our leaders to invest in local decision making. The case has been made by some from the Deliberative Democracy Consortium among others. It's a tough time right now for investors, but given what we witnessed in congressional town halls this past August, there's no better time to make the case for sustained, thoughtful, and dynamic citizen-centered engagement, especially as a revised approach to the public policy-making process or local problem-solving.
By Bobbie Stacey at 6:41 AM on Sep 15th, 2009
Alex Moll,

Thank you. I have been trying to launch localization efforts in our small community. What I have been missing is a guidebook that helps to draw others into the effort.

I will order a copy of "The Public Participation Handbook" and use it as my bible.
Name:  (optional)
Email:  (optional)
  Comment:
 
  Enter the text you see in the image below.